The Senate rejected a $14 billion dollar bailout plan for the auto industry.
The Bush administration, auto executives, and union leaders scrambled to put together a bail out plan.
With little time left, auto makers hurried to look for cash, even looking into the $700 billion financial bailout plan, which would not requite congressional approval.
Opposition from Republicans in the Senate led to the failure of the original Congressional bailout plan.
General Motors and Chrysler have been cutting jobs and slashing spending but still claimed that a direct infusion of cash was necessary.
Chrysler staked claim to $4 billion while GM asked for $10 billion, claiming that this money would be essential to keep them running through march.
Ford did not claim to require bailout help.
President Bush claimed to be committed to constructing a bailout package for the auto industry.
"By refusing to write a blank check to Detroit, Senate Republicans have started to reclaim some credibility on fiscal policy and the role of government." stated the Wall Street Journal.
The common belief is that no amount of bailout monies will save the auto industry without massive restructuring.
This would include a reduction of union wages and benefits.
There is another side to the bailout however, one that is embedded in the future administrations of the US government.
Such a bail out would provide the Obama administration and Congress "huge leverage over the cars Detroit builds"- this is a power that many organizations have craved for decades.
The Big Three auto makers only pay around $10 more an hour in wages and benefits than Toyota and other foreign car makers in the US.
Detroit's labor costs are much higher however due to the fact that they have been in existence for longer and thus have hundreds of thousands of retired workers receiving pensions and benefits.
Some see the potential bankruptcy of the auto makers as the way out. Stock holders will loose massive amounts of money however, placing the companies under Chapter 11 will free them from past obligations and thus allow them to produce better products, not focus their out put on profit needed to meet past obligations.\
Saturday, January 3, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment