Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Mike Fear- Interview
Thursday, March 19, 2009
What Does the Stimulus Mean for Maine?
$470 million in federal Medicaid dollars (FMAP) over the span of 27 months.
State Stabilization Fund- $196 million for Maine. Provides financial support for expenses such as elementary, secondary, and post-secondary education. Other needs include public safety as well as the modernization and renovation of K-12 post-secondary school.
$42.8 million for the Weatherization Assistance Program as well as $27.5 million for the State Energy Efficiency Program which is administered through Efficiency Maine.
Maine receives $116,295,00 in additional food stamp benefits (The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program). 13.6% increase in benefits will be seen by those currently utilizing food stamps. Families will also be able to use food stamps for a longer period of time.
School districts will receive $37.5 million in Title I-A Grants.
$11 million in Title I School improvement grants.
Special education funding in Maine will see $53 million through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Schools throughout the state will benefit.
Nation wide- $15.64 billion for Pell Grants. The maximum Pell Grant will be increased by $500 for a maximum of $5,300 in 2009 and by 2010 it will increase to $5,550.
Job Creation
$133 million for highway investments.
$50 million for water and sewer infrastructure.
“Making Work Pay” tax credit to $400 per worker and $800 per couple in a refundable tax credit to offset the 6.2 percent payroll tax on the first $6,450 of earned income.
$16.7 billion for retirees, disabled veterans and SSI Recipients. Those who do not qualify for the tax credit will receive $250 cash payments.
Restoration of cuts of Medicare payments to hospice. Results in $400,00 for Maine’s hospices.
17,000 families in Maine will be eligible for a new tax credit to make college affordable.
Crucial relief to Maine’s softwood lumber industry. Accomplished by waiving the requirement that they return funds paid to them after Canada violated U.S. trade law.
Temporary suspension of taxes on Unemployment Insurance Benefits. Will benefit more than 33,000 Mainers. Bill includes a $100 a month unemployment benefit increase.
Money will be overseen by the Governor’s office.
Ryan Low, Baldacci's finance commissioner, said the money coming into the state will be kept in separate accounts for each department. For example, if the state gets $5 million from the stimulus bill for bridge construction, the money would be kept in a Department of Transportation "bridge stimulus" account.
"What we wanted to make sure we could do is segregate and follow that federal stimulus dollar as it comes into state government and it goes out of state government," Low said.
Agencies will have to file a form called a ‘financial order’ to request funds, and the governor, Low and a state budget officer will have to sign off on each one. Then, the orders will go to the legislature, where the Appropriation Committee will have a chance to make statements about each expenditure, but will not have the power to block the spending.
"My hope and understanding is the governor will work closely with the Legislature on both budgeting the money and spending the money," said House Speaker Hannah Pingree (D-North Haven).
David Farmer, Baldacci’s chief of staff, said the Governor's Office plans to work with lawmakers.
Republican and Democratic legislative leaders have been meeting for several weeks with each other and with the Governor's Office on the process for handling the stimulus money.
The Legislature set up a trust fund for any Medicaid money to come with the stimulus package, giving it some control over how funds will be spent. It's looking to do something similar for any energy-related projects, which will likely be new initiatives and need more legislative oversight, Pingree said.
Senate Republican Leader Kevin Raye (R-Perry) said lawmakers made it clear to the governor that the funds should be spent on infrastructure projects of lasting value. Raye said lawmakers don't want the money spent on programs that would grow state government or prop up existing programs.
Some money might go directly to communities, although how much was unknown by presstime. Local school committees or city councils would have oversight of those funds.
Sunday, March 8, 2009
Higher income key to state's prosperity- Response
Higher income key to state's prosperity
This is a problem that must be addressed in order to help the state of Maine prosper stated a non-partisan group on m February 26th.
During a major recession in the 1990s, the Maine Economic Growth Council, comprised of a group of business leaders as well as others, was formed.
On the 26th, this council released in 15th "Measures of Growth" annual report.
This report tracks 24 indicators of the states economic state.
The purpose of this report is to identify 4 areas of strength and six areas of weakness in Maine's economy.
Laurie Lachance who is the director of the Maine Development Foundation stated that "We would be remiss if we were not to note we are in extraordinary times."
House Speaker Hannah Pingree states that this report should serve as a road map for decision makers as opportunities are presented to cut the federal budget, spend stimulus money and identify projects that can benefit the state as a whole.
Hannah Pingree speaks more directly to the issue of extending high speed internet to more of the state of Maine. She believes that federal stimulus money will help.
While Maine has gotten very high marks for investiment into research, job creation it appears has fallen to the wayside.
Pingree states that Maine needs to focus on tying research into jobs and job creation.
Tim Hussey who is the president of and CEO of Hussey Seating Co. stated his concern for the large gap in the worker productivity of the manufacturing sector.
Tim stated "We're falling behind. We have a gap of 24 percent and it's getting worse."
Sen. Christopher Recor is concerned about the high energy prices in the state of Maine and their impact upon businesses.
He believes further research at the University of Maine System will help.
Theodora Kalikow, the President of the University of Maine at Farmington, stated that a higher education level in more Maine residents will benefit the economy by allowing a larger population qualify for higher paying jobs.
She believes that the lack of educational funding is blocking economic progress in all directions.
Below are the six red flags identified in the report.
http://www.mdf.org/megc/measures/MOG2009.pdf
* Personal income: Maine ranks 35th nationally with a per capital personal income of $33,962.
* High speed Internet subscribers: Maine lags behind New England and the United States when it comes to Internet subscribers per 1,000 residents.
* Manufacturing productivity: There's a 24 percent gap between productivity of the Maine manufacturing worker and the rest of the United States.
* Cost of health care: Health care expenditures in Maine are nearly 20 percent of the state Gross Domestic Product, which is 7 percent higher than the national average.
* Cost of energy: The price of electricity in Maine is 32 percent higher than the national average.
* State and Local Tax Burden: The state's tax burden was 14.4 percent in 2006, according to census data.
Friday, March 6, 2009
Final focus; further research needed
There are many opinions circulating throughout our country and indeed our world that relate to the state and direction of the world economies. Many of them contradict each other and all of them are derived from a unique set of individual viewpoints. I can think of no better way to end my research and incorporate an observation into my project other than to observe how our global economy is impacting local Maine residents. By beginning research now encompassing the local economic strain I will soon be able to organize an interview or observational experience. This experience will allow me to thoroughly incorporate all of my research into how it all has affected one single person or business. I will be able to listen to and interpret their thoughts on the politics involved with this economic crisis. I will have the opportunity to observe how international business such as bank closing and foreclosures may or may not have impacted their successes.
The research needed to achieve a standard necessary for complete comprehension of this topic is extensive. I will need not only to familiarize myself with the state of the local economy but furthermore select one example out of many to exemplify our current economic state. I will begin this process searching through local media publications such as newspapers that will often write about small personal stories. Perhaps I will find a family whose home has been foreclosed on due to a bad mortgage or possibly I will be able to locate the owner of a business who has had to close their doors or lay off employees due to a lack of business. Any and every story I locate offers an opportunity to learn about local impact. I believe I will be able to find a personal story that will incorporate all of my research, which stretches to every corner of the globe, into one single unified experience. This story will offer insight into every aspect of the economy. This story will finish my project. This story will give me the personal aspect needed to adequately teach a group about the all-encompassing impact of an international economic crisis.
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Senate Approves Stimulus Plan- Responce
Senate Approves Stimulus Plan
While the bill saw full Democratic support, only three Republicans left their party to back the bill.
Senators Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine along with Arlen Spector of Pennsylvania gave their Republican support. "I am supporting the economic stimulus package for one simple reason: The country cannot afford not to take action,"
Spector stated that he had no option but to support the deal.
The 61-37 approval came as President Obama looked for public support in Florida- a state destroyed by foreclosures.
Negotiations will now begin to form a full compromise between both parties as well as the Senate and House as well as unemployment.
The Senate version of the bill looks to cut spending in the forms of school construction and state budgets.
However House Speaker Nanci Pelosi states that some spending needs to be restored for areas such as school construction.
Changes are headed do to the fact that the approval of the bill hinges upon three Republicans who are in essence holding all of the cards.
President Obama is moving to sign the bill into action before President's day. He pushed this desire by appealing to the public restating the benefits of the bill.
Obama stated that the bill would provide work for people creating wind farms and digital lines as well as repairing our roads and bridges.
3 million to 4 million jobs would be created.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
House passes $819 billion stimulus bill- Response
House passes $819 billion stimulus bill
Despite Obama's push for bipartisan support, no republicans voted for it and 11 Democrats voted against it.
The final vote was 244-188.
Next week, the Senate will begin the vote on the bill.
"I hope that we can continue to strengthen this plan before it get's to my desk" President Obama stated. "We must move swiftly and boldly to put Americans back to work and that is exactly what this plan begins to do."
The package offers opportunity to immediately replace lost jobs and restart economic growth. Such features were exemplified by almost complete support by Democrats.
House Speak Nanci Pelosi states that this bill does good on the inaugural address delivered by Obama last week. She states that this bill begins taking America in a new direction.
The critics of the bill examine the monstrous spending affiliated with it, the potential effectivness, and the lack of tax cuts.
Republicans lean towards tax-cuts to quickly jumpstart the economy, not slow moving spending.
Voted down by the House was a Republican amendment that slashed spending for the bill and added tax-cuts.
To pass a Senate vote, the bill will need a total of 60 votes, which will require 2 republican votes.
It is agreed that the bill is needed on the President's desk before the law maker's recess on President's Day in mid February.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
College On Credit- Response
College On Credit
Tuition costs are up 439% from the 1980s.
The average bill of college this year is $25,000.
Public universities are more affordable at $6,500 but still costly for some families.
More students are borrowing to finance their very own education.
Student debt has risen from $41 billion 10 years ago to $87 billion.
Two thirds who graduate from a four year program are in debt.
Although some colleges are starting to promise grants rather than loans, many colleges are stretching for money.
Many loans come from the government but as government funds are limited, much borrowing has turned to private sources.
Over the past academic year, $17.5 billion was borrowed from the private sector compared to $2.5 billion last year.
Private loans carry high interest rates. Up to 19%.
These loans are impossible to get out of even in the state of bankruptcy.
These loans are very tantalizing to desperate students and parents.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Liam's Third Response
Your citations might need a little work. I used the site http://dianahacker.com/ as a reference.
Katie's 3rd Response
Your blog is extremely intelligent-sounding, just like you, and the research seems to be developing nicely.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Jeanette's 3rd Response
Saturday, January 3, 2009
How the see us: Do U.S. carmakers deserve a break?- Response
How the see us: Do U.S. carmakers deserve a break?
The American auto industry is now in the same position that British auto makers were 30 years ago.
The Big Three auto makers "pay themselves too much, they've failed to modernize, and they no longer produce the sort of cars that anyone wants to buy".
The US intends to do the same things that the British did when their auto companies were risked- handing out cash.
Howe this will not be enough as can be seen from the outcome of the efforts made by the British.
It is thought that by March, the auto makers will be back asking for even more money.
"Huge amounts of tax payers money were spent propping up this dying industry" in Britain and "very little was there to show for it in the end".
Jeremy Warner believes that instead of subjecting the American auto industry to a "slow death by a thousand cuts" which is what is believed to have been the what the British car makers endured, Warner claims that bankruptcy would do the auto makers better.
This is the only "long term solution".
However, there are indeed other opinions being spouted across the pond.
Quentin Willson in Britain's Sunday Mirror thinks that the US auto makers have done themselves in with "lousy management, kowtowing to unions, too many big-drinking trucks and SUV's, and an arrogant contempt for small acrs and green technology"- bold statements to be made by a journalist who reports for a country who is not directly tied to the US auto industries implosion. Or is he???
Willson thinks that allowing the US auto makers to enter into bankruptcy would have a "seismic effect on the US economy" but also "hurt Europe".
Chapter 11 would indeed allow the auto industry to reorganize and get back on track with out sucking billions of dollars out of the US government's pockets. It is thought that this might have effects more widespread though.
The auto manufacturers' suppliers would fail due to the lack of business from the US, and thus, the European auto market would also falter, due to their reliance on the very same suppliers.
Bush's vow to rescue Detroit- Response
Bush's vow to rescue Detroit
The Bush administration, auto executives, and union leaders scrambled to put together a bail out plan.
With little time left, auto makers hurried to look for cash, even looking into the $700 billion financial bailout plan, which would not requite congressional approval.
Opposition from Republicans in the Senate led to the failure of the original Congressional bailout plan.
General Motors and Chrysler have been cutting jobs and slashing spending but still claimed that a direct infusion of cash was necessary.
Chrysler staked claim to $4 billion while GM asked for $10 billion, claiming that this money would be essential to keep them running through march.
Ford did not claim to require bailout help.
President Bush claimed to be committed to constructing a bailout package for the auto industry.
"By refusing to write a blank check to Detroit, Senate Republicans have started to reclaim some credibility on fiscal policy and the role of government." stated the Wall Street Journal.
The common belief is that no amount of bailout monies will save the auto industry without massive restructuring.
This would include a reduction of union wages and benefits.
There is another side to the bailout however, one that is embedded in the future administrations of the US government.
Such a bail out would provide the Obama administration and Congress "huge leverage over the cars Detroit builds"- this is a power that many organizations have craved for decades.
The Big Three auto makers only pay around $10 more an hour in wages and benefits than Toyota and other foreign car makers in the US.
Detroit's labor costs are much higher however due to the fact that they have been in existence for longer and thus have hundreds of thousands of retired workers receiving pensions and benefits.
Some see the potential bankruptcy of the auto makers as the way out. Stock holders will loose massive amounts of money however, placing the companies under Chapter 11 will free them from past obligations and thus allow them to produce better products, not focus their out put on profit needed to meet past obligations.\